Halo 2 vs. Halo 3 comparison

[Rath]

Legend11 said:

Rath said:

To put some perspective on it from my viewpoint, the 360 has 44 games on Gamerankings that received an average score of 80% or above while the Wii has 5 games to do that. Since those games that received 80% or above have great gameplay why wouldn't it seem logical for someone to pick the 360 over the Wii if their prime motivation is gameplay?

Thats an awful point and you know it. The fact is the Xbox has been out for a year longer than the Wii and so has a huge number more games. At least use percentages.

Why use percentages? How is that logical? If a system only had one game released for it and it scored above 80% would you consider it better than a system with 44 games that scored above 80% because 100% of the first system's releases scored well? I call it like it is. And right now the Wii and PS3 are sorely lacking compared to the Xbox 360 and percentages aren't going to change the reality of that. Anyways we should get back to the Halo2 vs. Halo3 comparison.

Only because the Xbox has had a lot longer to develop games. Its like saying because the PS1 has more games above 80% than the xbox 360 that its logical to buy the PS1 over the Xbox 360, when quite plainly its not true.

Take how many games the X360 had by this time if you align the launches of it and the Wii/PS3 and then you might have a valid point.