details of some 500 Anonymous members were posted

[Jordahn]

Mr Khan said:

Jordahn said:

Mr Khan said:

theprof00 said:

Mr Khan said:

 

The problem is what you claimed really isn't unbelieavable, except that if Sony wanted to move forward into a Pay-only PSN, they would just do it and not set up an elaborate scheme to justify it.

Which part is believable, Sony hiring Anon to hack them, or Sony going offline in a bid to increase profits upon return?

The sinister air with which you cast Sony is quite believable, not what you accused them of specifically, but how a lot of this is in their nature. Given that Sony's one of the lead cheerleaders for the bill to make America's internet more like China's, it's not that far out there.

SONY is teh evilz?

No more so than other major telecom/entertainment companies. It's endemic in the industry they're in. The only reason Nintendo comes out as somewhat more moral is because they have fewer interests to protect in the shady way that such companies "protect" their interests than Sony does.

"...somewhat more moral..."