spammythesmartone said:
epicberserk said:
spammythesmartone said:
Jazz2K said:
spammythesmartone said:
Jazz2K said:
Well of course it's unproven, it's still new and the second wave of games haven't released yet. I understand that praising games for Kinect that we didn't see anything yet is useless because they can end up pretty bad that's true. But the same can be said for downplaying it, they can end up being really good.
Look, did Uncharted 2 released in the first year of the PS3? No... it takes time and knowledge to craft good games and Kinect hasn't been out a year yet... let it go man, stop the hate and at least wait for E3!
|
Move is even newer and proven to work, kinect's been out for over half a year so no it should be proven by now if it can work
|
How is it newer if it was released before and is almost a copy of a controller already out for 5 years.
|
you mean like kinect is a copy of the eye toy for ps2 which released in 2003
|
dude get off the thread if your comparing that sayin move is better in tech then kinect your just showing your ignorance and kinect has tech that the eye toy never had so get a life dude
|
how is move a copy of wii but kinect not a copy of eye toy? and Move works with real games kinect doesn't atleast not yet regardless of how advanced the camera is
|
I won't start comparing Kinect vs Eye Toy and Wiimote vs Move as this has nothing to do with the thread.
Ok you don't like it it's ok but why bother posting?
Anyway, I can't wait to see what these companies will do with Kinect, in this case, first party studios don't have to develop for multiple control systems so all ressources will be focused at one place.
Essay Pro