Doobie_wop said:
Your also eqauting art with quality, not all art is good art (imo) and there is no objective view of art. People laugh when Black Ops is brought up, but how is Black Ops any different in terms of quality from this:
In the end, your attempting to close off the term 'art' to a very specific kind of idea, but the problem is that not everyone agrees with your idea and they shouldn't have to. When all it basically comes down to is that art is process of arranging items in a way that infleunces and affects one or more of the senses, emotions or intellect. Games fall under that definition. Just so you know, the way you think of art was traditional way, which is that art is used to describe something of skill or mastery. That traditional description changed during the Roman period and it's now just a method of stimulating thought or emotion. |
I get the impression that you just read the last word of my post and went on a rant.
I have not even touched upon many of the things you have implied in your post.
WHERE IS MY KORORINPA 3








