Anonymous is mad ((again) and feel they need to say something (again)

[hxczuner]

Galaki said:

hxczuner said:

Galaki said:

hxczuner said:

Or, because they cannot prove that they themselves are NOT responsible

Guilty until proven innocent.

That's not really what I'm saying. If you're the kid in school who always throws things in class, is anyone going to believe it wasn't you when someone else throws something in class? The fact that they have no credibility, and no means to really defend themselves (because they don't exist) is their issue right now.

My point still stand. By putting blame on a "likely" target without solid proof means you could be letting the real target get away.

How do you feel if you get thrown in jail for rape just because you happen to pass by the scene?

They're more than a likely target though, they're a repeated offender. Also, their "group" has attacked and threatened Sony already, as we all know, which does nothing for their innocence. To use your example: If I was a known rapist and had recently expressed my intention to rape someone, I wouldn't have a leg to stand on if that person was raped. I get what you're saying, an accusation should not precede the evidence. In this situation though, they've brought it on themselves.