| theprof00 said: so I played poorly eh? Worse than stefl and abc... ok. I guess, I'm wrong? How? Nobody was pushing for me....I got everyone to vote for a LURKER over me. That's like, a last resort! I just..don't..understand. sorry hat. |
I didn't say poorly.... i meant not up to your standard ^^ you didn't give a particularly stong vibe, which is what was the most odd about you this round. (now it's 2 weeks ago, I most likely forgot stuff and did not pay attention to other things that were important to you). And yes one person was severely pushing for you... Wonk. I actually thought at one point that this useless argument was a repeat of your distancing from gow a few rounds ago. But most notably, you made a pretty ackward move regarding linkz day 2 that put you on many people's radar, one thing that played for you is linkz's own shadiness due to his day one dsister move.
For Stefl, though the start of the game was weak, he made a decent attempt to take control of the town alongside linkz and that had chances to pay off once linkz was dead. Moreover, although he slipped, he did all he could to keep NotStan's chances open.
on ABC... though his style is peculiar, he does have some interesting insights... and it's because he used that approach day 4 that he convinced me. Everyone in the dead thread had it set for NotStan as scum... but I had no reason to think Wonk was mafia and I all the 3rd party suggestions didn't make sense... (had I thought of survivor sure, but I didn't)... Then he kept some consistancy on day 5... while NotStan crumble and I voted on gut feeling rather than judgement. So I would say yes, he played well enough to be convincing in the last day when I, the other townie, had every reason to think otherwise.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
