Booh! on 09 May 2011
| nanarchy said: The truly interesting thing on the blog and the discussions below it is that his research proved the exact OPPOSITE of what he is claiming, i.e. their were a number of servers that were not upto date.
Really this is just a bad security researcher that is using silly claims to grab some attention/hits. |
This proves that the only servers that were not up to date were those marked as rc. The purpose of these servers is unknown.
This, on the other hand, disproves the following original claims:
- Their servers were all out of date.
- Their servers had not firewalls.
- Their servers were outdated of as much as five years.
That's what professor Spafford told the Congress and what this stuff disproves.
