goforgold said:
RaptorGTA said:
goforgold said:
lolz @ people still comparing these games,
when COD gets HUGH maps, Massive vehicular warfare, a class system, and dedicated servers it would be about 10% comparable to any battlefield let alone BF3. That's got to be the worst thing this gen, COD players thinking they're getting a better, no no Compareable experience than Battlefield having no freaking clue as to what a battlefield game even is and no neither of the bad company spin offs count.
|
Meh, Bad compan 2 was a good intro for players. Lets face it..the main thing in BF is team work. Which hopfully Bad company showed players to do.
As for for what can MW3 do? I think first of all they need to make a new engine. Their still using the COD2 engine..if they want to dream bigger like what Dice is doing your going to need an engine that can support it.
Killstreaks? Sorry..MW2 ruined them for me. Black ops made them a little more balanced..but really..i dont see anything else they can do thats going to put the wow fact back like the AC-130 did.
The callsigns and emblems? I never bothered with those..but the custom ones on Black ops I loved em. Much like Halo's one. I think if they go away from custom one then its a step backward in the series.
Add in a vehicle map? The COD might as well be BF or Homefront.
IMO, theres nothing MW3 can do for me to buy it. MW2 was the lowest COD game for me (took it back after a month). Ill be buying BF3 for xbox and pc.
|
the amount of teamwork required to achieve success in Bad Company 2 would get you abosulty nowhere in any of the main line PC battlefields. Bad Company 1 was closer (it actually had a class system) but BC2 made sure to get rid of most of that games gameplay to appeal to casuals.
but sadly I do think BF3 will be more like BC2 than BF2.
|
Good thing about that is that BF2 infantry combat was shit.... BC2 improved on it tremendously. But yeah, they are making it more BC2ish, which is odd, because BC is sort of a mix of BF and COD in the first place.
