By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cr00mz on 06 May 2011
Edit Thread
BenVTrigger said:
cr00mz said:
BenVTrigger said:
cr00mz said:

this was disappointing i was expecting something new (AC3) and instead we get this, this milking. Shame on you Ubisoft



I find it hilarious when people try to say AC is milking a franchise.

Considering how different and vastly improved each game has been over the other it blows me away ANYONE could accuse them of milking.

Especially since each one has been in an entirely different setting.  You do realize the only thing thats conistant with the franchise right now is Ezio?  Most franchises use the same character so who cares if they make 3 games with him?

this will be the third game with the same character, in as many years. Personaly i hate yearly franchises.

Well i care, i didnt like Ezio in his first game, so i want them to make AC3 new time period new character.


Do you hold every franchise to the same standard?

Do you expect every game in a franchise to have a brand new character and a brand new timeline?

Thats whats so funny about people claiming Ubi is "milking" AC just because they are sticking to a similar timeline and character when no one else holds any other franchise to the same standard.

Fans like Ezio, and they are taking the game to an entire new locatinon and this one features all three Assassins introduced in the series as playable characters.  This seems FAR from milking a franchise to me.  Just because its yearly quality hasn't suffered at all.

Obiously no, i mean Zelda is a perfect example of a game that hardly ever changes. Yet i'm ok with it, why? because we get one game every 5 years (not always), that keeps me from getting tired of the formula.

3 Assassin's Creed in 3 years, and they are basically all the same. When i first played Assassin's Creed 1, it was mindblowing, now it went from wow to meh, like every other yearly franchise.