osamanobama said:
Badassbab said:
cory.ok said:
Badassbab said:
What? 3 discs on 360? Is it the same game engine that powered GTAIV and RDR? Because if it is I've got a tough decision to make. Technically superior 360 version or one disc PS3 version. Hell might go with PC.
|
technically superior how?
|
The RAGE engine that powered GTAIV and RDR was-
720p on 360 vs 640p on PS3
Superior framerate on 360
More foliage for 360 RDR
MSAA on 360 vs QAA on PS3
Superior draw distance on 360 RDR
Superior water effects on 360
Supeior shadows on 360
Missing shadows on PS3 RDR
PS3 did hold some advantages of it's own though such as-
Triple Buffered V Sync (360 was double buffered with soft v-sync)
Sometimes superior shadow casting and lighting on RDR
GTAIV TV watching was superior on PS3 due to blu ray space
|
yes, after reading the review on DF, it sounded like both games had their pros and cons but overall the xbox version was better.
but with RDR, it seemed as if the already small difference shunk a lot more. making them nearly identical
|
Might not be night and day but there is a difference.
The Xbox 360 versionRed Dead Redemption possesses higher resolution, improved levels of detail, noticeably superior performance in-game and fewer jaggies owing to a more consistently applied anti-aliasing solution that doesn't blur the image. Shadows are generally sharper, and of better quality (particularly on the characters' self-shadows).
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off?page=2
