Grimes said:
LivingMetal said:
Grimes said:
LivingMetal said:
Galaki said:
LivingMetal said:
I know what you're saying, but the "consumers rights" argument have been abused on these boards to give excuse to bash a console maker in this context. I have openly voiced that the PS3 is my console of choice. Sony has not violated my right as a consumers. Hackers have made my gaming life "harder." When Sony protects their IP, that in turn gives consumers such as I a better gaming experience. Let's not take thing out of context to "prove" a point.
|
Remember that you're not the only customer. Just because it's okay to you may not be okay to someone else. They are just excercising their rights.
|
Oh, you mean those consumers who think they have a right to violate the TOS they agreed upon?
|
Terms of service isn't always binding and can be nullified rather easily. It's not the same thing as a signed contract.
|
And how is this specifically applicable?
|
You can write whatever you want in a ToS, but it has to be consistent with case law. If case law dictates that something is allowable, the ToS can't deny somebody that right. Therefore if case law determines that it is legal to hack a system, for example a cell phone, the ToS can't take that right away. Likewise, if the courts were to determine it's ok to hack a console, then the ToS could not deny a person that right.
|
So does this apply to Sony in regards to the PS3?
