Lots of bashing for the belief of God....

[Joelcool7]

Final-Fan said:

Joelcool7 said:

How are they not theories? I can come up with a theory and it is a theory. A hypothesis is a theory. Just because you don't believe it doesn't make it any less of a theory. Now you could try and argue it is not a scientific theory but their is scientific evidence to support the majority of creationist theories.

I could take a big huge dump in my back yard and call it a scientific theory that flies are attracted to the type of grass that grows in my back yard, but that doesn't make it deserving of the same respect as Newton's theory of gravity.  And it certainly wouldn't be very scientific. 

Will respond in more detail later. 

See only difference is Newtons Theory of Gravity is based on scientific facts. Macro Evolution for example is not based on Scientific fact, yet many here and abroad call it a scientific theory.

All I was saying is that Macro Evolution and yes even the Big Bang are not Scientific theories. Even the recent collider built to test the Big Bang theories credibility still doesn't prove such a thing could or did happen without the tampering of man.

A scientific theory is something based on scientific fact. Some Dinasuars were carnivores, well we know the bones existed, but none of us can see a dinasuar and none can observe it eating. But the tooth fossil type would suggest that they were. Its a theory not a fact but it is based on scientific fact making it a scientific theory.

All i was trying to prove is that a theory doesn't have to even be based on scientific fact. or any fact actually. Anyone can make a theory. Example conspiracy theories, are they not theories? Some of them aren't even based on fact like "Obama wasn't born in America" a theory that was infact false we all know it is but it is still a theory. Or that Bush carried out 9/11 or that America faked the moon landing. All three are theories.

So what makes the theory of Macro Evolution anymore of a logical theory then that of intelligent design? Neither can be proven right or wrong by scientific fact. Both are based around some scientific evidence.

Most of the creationist and evolutionist theories are more logical then the theory that Obama isn't American. But honestly they are just theories neither proven correct or false.

That is all I have been getting at!