ManusJustus said:
Two questions: 1. I've shown your logic to be false and I've shown how your own sources have shown your logic to be false. Why keep arguing? 2. You admit that you are arguing for something that you disagree with. So are you playing Devil's Advocate or Troll? If you are playing Devi's Advocate I'll gladly continue this debate, but if you are playing troll I would rather not continue to feed you. |
1. No you didn't? You haven't even adressed any of the sources... outside the NYC one... where you didn't fully read and were proven wrong on.
2. I'm not argueing for something I disagree with. I'm argueing something would work that I disagree with.
Unlike you, I don't hold the viewpoint that something I don't think should happen, is impossible. I don't think we should have military bases overseas, but I wouldn't say that was impossible... because it's totally possible, and happening.
Just like private roads.
As for why I'm argueing for it... I much less accepting of dumb arguements from people I agree with, then from people I disagree with... because bad nonsensical arguements like the ones you've been making act exactly like "Strawmen" except it's someone actually making that argument, so it's somewhat more effective.
It's a common tactic you see on TV where to isolate and make ones opinion foolish, they find the people to represent that view who have arguements like yours... that are eaisly refuted because they're off base.
