Ail said:
Vetteman94 said:
Ail said:
thranx said:
LivingMetal said:
thranx said:
LivingMetal said:
thranx said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
Vetteman94 said:
Galaki said:
| Apparently, the firm is claiming Anonymous were responsible for the attack, as a file named Anonymous was found on one of Sony’s servers with the words “We are Legion” attached to it. |
Really? You can pin the blame with a text file? :)
|
Sure why not
|
yep and with those assholes recent history, evidence are 'against' them.
and I don't think they said they were responsible tho right? I think they just said a file was left by the hackers with that name.
honest to god if I see one more guy defending hackers I'm gonna lose it!
or not but yea you get the point
|
Not all hackers are evil. Perhaps if people would stop trying to piant every hacker as wrong/evil others would not have to defend hackers that are not doing anything wrong.
|
Perhaps some users here should stop bashing Sony at most every turn just because the PS3 is not their system of choice. Therefore, others would not have to defend Sony that are not doing anything wrong.
|
I am not talking about defending Sony, that is fine. He was talking about hackers. Perhaps you guys would defend sony better by putting forth good arguments as to why they are right in this situation istead of the "la la la defence its all the hackers faults they are evil."
|
A lot of us have put out good arguments in favor of Sony. But the Sony haters will always hate, never agree. Do you agree?
|
No i dont agree. I have yet to see sony supporters reconcile the fact that sony did not keep their server software up to date which is a basic security task.
|
You know the only information we have concerning that is a guy reporting they were running an old version of Apache.
That version while not being up todate had no known security hole...
|
I thought that it did have a known vulnerability that was fixed on the later versions
|
This is the list of apache vulnerabilities :
http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_22.html
Supposedly sony was running 2.2.15.
The only vulnerabilities listed related to DoS, not breaching the machine...
|
Actually, you'd see in 2.2.17 (released last October) showed an overhaul of the authentication/authorization module.
It has already been confirmed that the breach used was one that was fixed by Apache several months ago.
