By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake on 04 May 2011
Edit Thread
trestres said:
sapphi_snake said:
trestres said:

Looks like our discussion was a misunderstanding, since we were both using different definitions for a same word. Both valid, but in different contexts.

No, your definition is invalid in the current English language. The etymology has no relevance to the usage of a word in a given language. You should've used the original term (the Latin term or whatever).

The original term "re ligare" means to "connect once again to". It's not invalid in philosophy, I don't know where you got that idea from.

Listen, I see we're talking different languages (possibbly literally), so I don't see this going anywhere.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)