One of the most ridiculosu statements ever made. What do you base this one? More of your circular logic?
It`s the religious understanding - and mine too - that the act of homosexuality is wrong because man and women are seen as complementary. So, going against that line of thought is deviating from human nature.
Circular logic mainly shows how a linguistic argument is flawed in the sense that to explain or expose something it always needs to, in a implicit or explicit way, have the object of said argument to actually be part of it.
Otherwise we would have something like: rain, therefore sun.
Our explanation always used something of it`s object to remain coherent. You can`t explain something with what it`s not.
The relationship you talk about is that of a tyrant (God) and his slaves/puppets (humans). Humans have no rights in the relationship you describe, their individuality, desires don't account, all that matters is satisfying the tyrant's whims. Who wants to be part of such a relationship?
Exactly... if you take out everything that i mentioned to make the statement that i made. So, a person that dies for everyone is the same as a dicatator. Someone who lets you choose is the same as the one who doesn`t allow you to choose. Makes sense?
If you don`t believe in God, it`s one thing, but if you take into consideration one aspect of God, you should at least take everything into consideration.
I don't get the "four our sake part". This is probably one of the most irrational parts of Christianity. Also, you used too much circular logic in this post.
And the point of that was? Considering Jesus was "God" (in your view) no suffering he would've experienced would've been a big deal, and what was the point? What's this whole "dying for us" nonsesne? You're talking as if humanity was in danger and he saved it, however the only thing threatening humanity was, ironically, God.
This action that you don`t understand has a BIG theological implications. It`s not a question of how big was the suffering.
Man sins and by doing that they place themselves away from God. That`s why Jesus/God sacrificed Himself to God so as to not let men die in sin. With His death He also showed that anyone can go to Heaven if they decide to open their hearts to God.
If he doesn't want people to suffer he should treat them with respect, rather than demanding submission. If he doesn't like it, he should've created mindless drones, rather than being with free will and the ability (so rarely used) to think critically. Just because he created humans doesn't mean he has any right to people's lives.
Treat them with more respect than offering Himself to die so we can go to Heaven? How more can one person love another, when he or she offer themselves for the ones they love.
That`s an act of love.
He doesn`t have the right to people`s lives? It`s not a matter of who owns who? God sees us as His children no more than you father sees you as his children. He never demands anything, not even Jesus did, He asks for something, which happens to be in our best interest.
So you assume that drugs are harmful. Know why? Because it destroys men.
LOL, yes, they can certainly destroy one's health in excess.
The real problem about drugs or other addictions is that they do become your God, that`s why they are considered sinful.
Homosexuality is perfectly normal. And it's funny how you changed your tone (from the above). Homosexuality, unlike drugs and alcohol (which Jesus himself drank BTW) doesn't destroy men (something perfectly obvious), so why is it wrong?
Don`t know how i changed my tone... honestly.
If something deviates men from God, that results in men`s fall.
