Mr Khan said:
That's what really shows the bias of Ryan's plan, though. All it'd take is 20% longer, you'd save the same amount, but it wouldn't cripple social programs like Ryan's would. It's an almost unveiled attack on our human services |
Well... that and it's not REALLY a savings either way.
We'd still be running deficits of around a trillion dollars a year. It's not deficit reduction... it's deficit... increasing but just by not that much.
It's like a young married couple who runs up giant credit card bills argueing over eating out 4 times a week or 5.
The Obama plan saves 333 billion a year. The Ryan plan, 400 Billion.
We're spend 1.5 Trillion this year.
So... we'd still be spending a trillion a freaking year.








