noname2200 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
in order of this to be considered "personal info" the name and one of the 5 in the list need to be presented without being encrypted. the credit card info was encrypted so this is not considered personal info. Also, sony included a 3rd party to come in to investigate what occured AND has been working with the FBI and englands officials
|
Again, I'm excluding the credit card information; the scenario I posted does not depend on that credit card information at all, and I only raised it to explain why it's not the focus. But the rest of the data were not encrypted.
http://gamrfeed.vgchartz.com/story/85847/sony-credit-card-info-was-encrypted-personal-info-was-not/
"The bad news is your personal information such as your name, address and birthday are NOT encrypted."
Presumably, your e-mail address and PSN password are also not encrypted, unless those are for some reason put under the credit card data table. Per Sony:
http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/04/27/qa-1-for-playstation-network-and-qriocity-services/
"The entire credit card table was encrypted and we have no evidence that credit card data was taken. The personal data table, which is a separate data set, was not encrypted."
Finally, the last sentence has no bearing I can see on whether this law applies. It is of course commendable that they are investigating what's happened, and I wish them the best of luck in finding and prosecuting the perpetrators. However, this statute requires immediate notice to consumers, yet a week passed before such notice was given. I ask again: do you know that this delay was at the behest of a law enforcement agency?
|
