By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 27 April 2011
Edit Thread
imaprettyhotguy said:
yo_john117 said:
It wasn't acceptable for them either. Its not acceptable, it wasn't then, it isn't now, and it never ever was or will be. 

Its not acceptable and thats all there is to it.

My question is still valid why are people holding Sony to a higher standard then them saying the loss will be 23 billion when the places that lost more credit card numbers didn't even come close to that, it's just riddicules the amount of blame and responsibility people are putting on Sony, as far as we know they didn't eve lose credit card info and were up to industry standards 90% of the blame is based on assumptions people are jumping the gun way to much on this 

People saying 23 billion are likely talking about the fact that each offense of a theft like this usually costs like, $300 and Sony would be repsonsible for that.

As would ANY company.

77 Million... times 300 = 23 Billion.

http://www.psu.com/PlayStation-Network-hack-could-cost-Sony-$318-per-account,-claims-research-firm--a011467-p0.php