twesterm said:
imaprettyhotguy said:
twesterm said:
imaprettyhotguy said:
There's no proof they were trying to take information, just that they had acess to it, and there's the bait and switch tactic, pretend to go for something to make your actual goal easier, this method has been more effective at briging psn down then anons brute force tatics, and again theres no proof they were looking for the info just that they had access to it and again theres no proof they took the info or even looked at it just that they had the ability to acess to it you are operating under an assumption of an assumption
|
So you're basically saying it's implausible to assume they did anything with the information they did take but it's perfectly reasonable to assume they were pulling off some overly complicated bait and switch tactic?
Yeah, we're done here. I'm not even convinced you believe yourself.
|
No waht I'm saying iis you shouldn't assume they took the information when there no proof they did or even could on a massive scale, the only thing we know is they had the ability to acess it, we don't even know that they did yet you are talking like it's a fact that they took everyones info
|
What the crap are you talking about? Sony themselves have confirmed they took the personal data. I'm really not sure what proof you're looking for.
|
No they confirmed they had the ability to acess it, this is why you should read the actual statements and not just the titles of journalists