Porcupine_I said:
irstupid said:
Porcupine_I said:
irstupid said:
well house isn't best example, cause you would assume they wouldl be on lookout.
but lets take a typical csi tv case. how often does a murder happen and there HAPPENS to have been some argument between the victom and some guy that results in "i'm going to kill you" statement. That guy is never guilty.
But if you really do want to kill someone, waht better time than when they get in a huge argument and near blows with someone else. The blame finger will point to that person very quickly.
|
ok, so, a fictional TV show is a better example then my house?
how about you just answer my question: is it really absurd to suspect them? that is all i want to know.
|
if your brother is killed PSN IS HACKED tomorrow and today he SONY had a huge fight with someone and the typical "i'll kill you HACK YOUR NETWORK" line is thrown in that argument.
what the first thing to pop in your mind tomorrow when you hear of your brother being killed PSN IS BEING HACKED?
that's the same as this id theft will be. if i found out someone stole my identity, the only thing i could think of would be this psn fiascol. i'm not saying in either case its true, but just making a point.
now then lets examine our idiotic news. they would LOVE to broadcast and have a story about the thousands of people that had their identity stolen "apparantly" by this psn fiascol.
|
i fixed that first sentence to show we actually agree, and i will take that as a answer to my question you appeared to dodge!
|
i never said you were wrong. its obvoius people will suspect anon. i just saying it could have been another hacker taking anon's spotlight to sneakily hack it himself.
everyone right now thinks its anon's work.
if this was half a year ago, everyone would be looking for the random hacker who did this. right now though since anon wnet into the spotlight they are the prime suspects.
Essay Pro