There is a limit to how much a person can contribute to a political campaign. If that person lives in another country, more power to him. Are you suggesting that we should force him to live in America to pay taxes?
Your last paragraph does not make sense to former posts I have made. Again, if it helps all individuals save money, therefore having more money how is this bad? But you suggest that "If this helps All individuals in the country, the gross tax income for the country would decline" which doesn't make logical sense. If people save more money than they spend, yes it would decline the revenue to the government, but there is no evidence that there will be any decline in spending under the FairTax. Final and I have already discussed the tax cuts for the 1%, with varying view points about the benefits thereof.
There is extensive research by respected economists on the rate of the FairTax to remain revenue neutral. Check previous posts for the link (page 4 or 5 I think).
I believe that there should be spending cuts already so your argument against the FairTax based on spending of the government doesn't move me.
I am in a hurry otherwise I would go into more detail.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
