| Rath said: It must be strongly noted that there are definite differences between a public-private partnership and purely private enterprise. Take roads for example, a public-private partnership involves the government (at whatever level) contracting out road building and maintenance. Purely private involves the roads being built and maintained by private companies and being paid for through road tolls. Public-private partnerships are (in my opinion) a good idea for a lot of things that do not strongly risk human lives, such as transport infrastructure, communications infrastructure and maintenance of public areas.They probably should be generally kept away from things like fire service, ambulance service, prisons and defence though. |
Just a note: private companies, in my experience, do a great job at EMS when needed. I worked dispatch for our local police station, and we contracted EMS when the city had all crews out. I also worked at said EMS company after leaving dispatch, and they did a fantastic job. So I think the line can be blurred betwen what works through private entities, and what must strictly be public. Don't get me wrong, matters of justice are probably best suited to the government, but I think that is about the only think that really needs to go in the government column.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
