Runa216 said:
#1 is completely irrelevant, doubly so since I saw virtually no difference between the PC version at its highest settings and the PS3 version. Even if there was a considerable difference, the gameplay is identical, therefore any slight differences in graphics are negligible. It's people who care about graphics this much that result in so many modern games being the same old crap over and over again: Publishers want safe IP's and not new interesting shit. 2 - this I do agree on. The load times were more than a little distracting, but not enough to actually complain about. 3 - I thought the pacing was pretty much perfect. I do agree that there were a few too many puzzles in the second act, with Cave Johnson narrating, but other than that I felt it flowed perfectly, and I loved how you were changing environments as the game went on. Overgrown and broken, rebuilding, old crappy facility, new fixed facility. I just thought it was so much better. |
Like I said, I loved the game.
But I like calling a spade a spade, and the graphics in Portal PS3 are no better than Bioshock PS3.
Yeah sure the graphics don't matter, but that doesn't mean that I can't comment on them.
And sir, your PC is a pile of crap if it looks identical to the console version when on highest settings. Just saying.







