sapphi_snake on 25 April 2011
pizzahut451 said:
sapphi_snake said:
HappySqurriel said:
sapphi_snake said:
HappySqurriel said:
Outside of a curriculum based need, and before children reach a certain age, race should not be discussed in any significant way.
In case you don't understand, this is as much to prevent a second grade teacher from spending a little time each day convincing their students that homosexuality is an immoral choice and gay marriage is wrong as it is to teach a more tollerant message.
|
Come on, you'd have to be terribly naive to think that this was done to protect gays.
|
This case in particular probably wasn't, but (in general) a policy preventing issues being discussed unless there is a significant need within the curriculum and it is at a age appropriate level benefits everyone.
|
In general, but in this particular case I think the point is to decrease visibility of homosexuality, and make gayness seem even more deviant, taboo etc.
|

|
Don't you people think that there's a "conspiracy" in schools to turn kids gay, by simply mentioning it?
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)