EdStation3 on 25 April 2011
Can't we already consider the 360 to be in last place. Not in raw numbers, but per capita.
The PS3 has been out for 4.4 years and the 360 for 5.4 years.
Saleswise they stand at 48.2 and 52.1 respective.
PS3 has %92.5 of sales the 360 has but has only been out for %81.4 of the 360 life time. That's %11 difference.
If you add on to PS3 or subtract from 360 the extra %18 extra life time the PS3 would have 56.8million right now. The fact that they released early but don't have the sales to back it up would theoretically put them in last. If two runners were running and the first got a 1/5 of the head start over the 2nd runner and he caught up and it only 3 steps behind, wouldn't you consider the 2nd runner to be the faster of the two?
