Game critics have failed casual gamers, in my opinion. Never a great casual

[Kenryoku_Maxis]

ssj12 said:

Kenryoku_Maxis said:

enditall727 said:

what casual game do you think deserve's a 95%?

Depends on your definition of Casual.  But I'd say:

Sim City 3000

Super Mario Galaxy

Kirby's Canvas Curse

etc.

Anyway, its natural for sites like IGN or magazines like Game Informer to be harsh on the 'casual' games.  Not only are they appealing to the 'hardcore' market, but they themselves are people who grew up playing what they considered 'core' games.

What I'm mad about is how reviewers have been so obviously bias against Wii and DS games.  And even considering 'graphical limitations', they've obviously been downscoring both Wii and DS games with a clear bias.  And not just the 'casual' titles, but the actual good titles on the systems.

Not that this is surprising as they practically did the same think for the GBA, N64 and GC.  But never this bad...

didnt all those get about 90%, and Sim City 3000 if I remember right wasn't that great.

Kirby's Canvas Curse and Sim City 3000 got avg reviews (8.0-8.5).  And no, you are remembering wrong.  Sim City 3000 Unlimited is the most balanced and 'fun' of all the games.  Sim City 4 is the one with all the problems.