By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
axt113 on 21 April 2011
Edit Thread
Vetteman94 said:
axt113 said:
Vetteman94 said:

Oh you mean like how Sony did it the previous 2 generations?   See I bring up irrelevant points also


actually you prove my point, no need to have a more powerful system, as the weaker one wins

Which is exactly why MS and Sony can ignore that Nintendo is releasing a console this early, which is the point of the thread.  Since there is no threat that the 3rd party support they are getting will go anywhere.  Nintendo will have to rely on their first party which hasnt always worked out for them.  


Except as we saw with the Wii that argument is false, as they can dominate on the strength of their first party alone, the highest selling games around, and without needing a lot of power, and as we know, Nintendo tends to be revolutionary and even disruptive with its systems, things  that MS and Sony can't match



Rumors indicate that it is planning on following the first approach, sticking a new, motion-sensitive controller onto an existing console. Our perspective is that this is the worst of the three options.

-Clayton Christensen back in 2007 already knew Move would be a bad idea