I don't mind a journalist posting their top 10 list based on their opinion but when you try and pass it off as some carefully crafted order based on a technical critique it's a joke. It says based on the merits "technically and visually" with no futher highlighting of how they were supposedly scored to come to this "ranking".
Why has nobody bothered to question the motivation of a list like this that includes zero technial analysis? There seems to me a very obvious reason Gears 2 is in there and not Mass Effect 2, they felt like giving a concession to 360 owners in the form of a exclusive in there. To me it just makes even more of a mockery of the "ranking" system they used (i.e. pulled out of their ass and plonked on a page). This is first class shit journalism for hits, seems to have paid off too given the attention they're getting.
