By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Porcupine_I said:
Doobie_wop said:

I find it extremely odd that none of the reviews have been mentioning the differences, either they aren't that different or the biased game media strikes again, odd how they like to compare some games, but then ignore others.

(Opens up cans of worms).

Valve probably spent more time on the PS3 version, it happens, it's been happening for years and we've seen the results. It just goes to show that multi-platform development on the PS3 was usually a problem of priority and not superiority. The same applies to the 360.

i agree.

and i suppose the 360 version is how their engine always looked on the 360. Until now i haven't heard any complaints about previous valve games. nobody cried out that they didn't look as great as other games, i don't even remember ANY kind of valve graphics comparisons the last few years.

but now since they optimized their engine for the PS3 it's suddenly  an issue, its"sabotage"

 

that song is awesome...

ontopic... well picture comparations are pointless is this case but a few months ago were very important to chose a game in the right platform... the irony... well in this case, even if ps3 version was worse, if you have a capable PC, that version is the best just for the free PC version included... graphics is important but if you never see the other version, for you, the game looks what it should look...



Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4