By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xen said:

A 9? From both IGN AND Eurogamer? REALLY?

Most characters in the game are of Final Fantasy's weakest, the story is boring, the music has been far surpassed by later FF's, the battle system blows, and its only saviors are fine style and a tough difficulty.

I want the same treatment for FF VI, it's far better. IV is a 6.5/10.

I think your being a bit harsh. yes i agree FF6 was  better, but FF4 came before that, and FF6 had the gift of heinsight and thus better game development. story wise i think its good, definitly not as boring as something like FF13. the characters are actully quite deep imo. yes Cecil is a bit bland, but characters like Kain and Edge breath life into game.and much better than the god awful cast of FF13.

and FF4's battle system was okay imo, it was fast, easy and accessible. really good formula for the early days of the SNES. still holds up well imo.