Kasz216 said:
It creates an even bigger welfare problem however, that's how it addresses it. As everyone who meets the requirments have a right to the check, and none of the requirmenets for the prebate is that one of your family members work or have worked in the past. The government is more or less providing everyone with food, water and other life essentials by taking money more so from those who spend more. Also, there is a secondary problem in that to sign up for the prebate tax you need an address. Many hardworking people live out of motels in the winter months and their cars in the summer months. Many of these people at or below the poverty level would not be eligable for the prebate Get rid of the address requirement and EVERYONE will sign up for the prebate, including the homeless and the like, which while great would once again lead to that "extending welfare" thing as the amount of money that would go to them each month as a prebate would likely be way more then our government spends per person on the homeless now when you consider howmuch more it would cost in infrastructure and that we'd likely keep a number of our welfare and other such programs.. Which would seem to indicate costs would be much much higher then expected. |
Alright as an extra incentive lets add Social Security and Welfare Reform to the FairTax bill. Lets also add a "Thrifty Congress" bill aka Balanced Budget bill, whereby the Government cannot spend more than what was taken in the previous year, or the expected revenue in the current year.
Would this be acceptable now? I want all these to pass, but I don't know if we could create a bill that did all of this at once and still pass the House and Senate.








