By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LivingMetal said:


Maybe it's because the settlement was on March 31th while the Anon attacks were afterwards.  So Anon attacks were not an result of "forcing Sony to settle."  So yes, you were misinformed.  I didn't want to blatanly point that out, but it LOOKS like I had to. 

I knew that. I never said they looked like that to me... 

I even made the Jackson reference... Let me tell you what I mean by it. See Jackson led his troops into defending an invasion force from the British after the war had ended. No one knew it ended. A little while after Jackson had won word had spread that the war was over. People looked at Jackson's battles and naturally figured since that was the last fight then it was obviously he who had ended the war for them. skyrocketing him into popularity

Now, Anonymous DDoS's several of Sony's sites to the point they are taken offline after Sony settled. Then word spread that Sony has settled, without actually accomplishing anything and achieving none of their goals(really if you think Sony's original goals were to spend millions of dollars to stop one kid, you need to take another look around) after Anonymous' attacks. What do you think it will look like to the people that don't follow it closely on forums?



Sig thanks to Saber! :D