Grimes said:
theprof00 said:
Grimes said:
theprof00 said:
dsister said:
1. Geohot walked away without any problems m
2. Sony spent over a million dollars trying to prosecute him
3. Sony lost a customer(who bought quite a few PS3s)
yes, Sony definitely won
|
According to the injunction, the injunction itself applies to every hacker that Geohotz has contact with.
I'm guessing that the subpeona for all those IPs, personal information, etc etc has something to do with the scope of that victory.
|
A private settlement can't make a ruling for anyone but the parties involved. Nor can they used any of collected data beyond the scope of what the courts allowed, which was only to establish location of alleged activity.
|
SO what does this mean then?
"ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by consent of the Parties that Hotz,
whether as an individual or as a principal, officer, director or employee of any business
entity, and his agents, servants, employees, distributors, suppliers, representatives and all
other persons or entities acting in concert or participation with Hotz who receive notice of
this Judgment, shall be and hereby are permanently enjoined and restrained from:"
Stamped by the judge.
|
The key words are "who receive notice of this judgement". To receive a notice you have to be a party directly involved with the case.
|
And they droppped charges against everybody else. Likely because it wouldn't of held up anyway.
I thought you were supposed to be studying law Prof?
