4k1x3r said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
GT5 hasn't had a price cut, while Reach has. Puts things in perspective.
|
Why is GT5 below Reach's numbers two months ago then? Keep beating that drum though, it amuses me.
|
Well, considering Gran Turismo doesn't sell like Halo (even though the end result may be neck and neck), the answer is pretty simple. And you can save your usual bullshit, condescending approach for somebody else. Nothing was wrong in what I said, nor should it have struck a personal nerve.
|
Oh it's just the same tired lines you've posted every week for like the last month.
Whenever someone mentions Halo: Reach's sales, I'm always looking forward to your "But it had a price cut!" posts attempting to dismiss them. I look forward to such commentary when Gran Turismo gets one.
|
What about Halo Reach being bundled like hell? That and a price cut at 39.99$ and the sales directly appear less impressive. But you won't see that this way for obvious reasons. You say people try to downplay Halo Reach sales, but it's often an answer to people like you making them appear what they're not. If the game had those sales with full price and without bundle then yea, that'd be freaking impressive, ftb it's not, or at least no the way you think it is.
|
Hate to break it to you but Halo Reach has no bundles nor has it had any in the past.
