Tridrakious said:
Acevil said:
Tridrakious said:
Acevil said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdLVMdyRNCU&feature=related
Also one thing being fired up and being passionate about products, another is insulting competitive products. If an organization is comfortable about their products, they would find the need to insult other products. However Jack Tretton (SCEA) is on the losing side of things both to the 360 and Nintendo, so he has to be on the offensive. However he comes off as a sore-loser because people value his product less in his region.
|
It sucks that the American market would rather have the Xbox 360 over the PS3. It really does. And I'm not saying that Jack Tretton has done a good job with his position.
He's a great guy and all, but I was shocked when Sony promoted him to fill Kaz's spot to run the American division. He was the scapegoat as VP.
|
I don't care about total sales, but how does it suck that the american market prefers xbox360 over ps3. Namely when you management like Jack Tretton, which seem to like talking more about the competition then his own product?
Edit: I should clarify, I don't care about total sales in terms of competition with one another, however I do like seeing trends and other details, that sales can provide. Also software sales typically make me happy.
|
Because over the last couple years the 360 has become the Halo/COD/Gears-box. Shooters.
PS3 has really pushed itself passed the ip that made the PS2 a success. Taking more risks and chances.
Lair, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, Demon's Souls, Heavy Rain, Resistance, Uncharted, EyePet, MAG, LittleBigPlanet, White Knight Chronicles and inFAMOUS. (Warhawk was completely re-imagined on PS3 over it's PS1 debut so I kinda consider it a new ip).
Even with all that, Sony is still openly taking risks on new ip on the PS3. The Last Guardian, Sorcery, Agent (even though it's Rockstar developing it, Sony seems to be helping with it)
|
