vlad321 said:
1. To be fair, you can start off as a pretty average person in DA: O, or as a noble, or one of several other choices. You don't have those in this one. 2. You say people didn't play DAO in any more advanced way. Alright, good, but you had the choice of being more advanced in DA:O, not so in DA2. Those 2 points right there alright give you an objectively worse game. You have less choice, and therefore it is simply worse. Objectively worse. FInally, my problem is that people think that if they enjoyed a game, it makes it good. I despise this because, just like with any other entertainment medium, this is simply not true. It is faulty logic. We can all like bad quality entertainment and be entertained by it. I don't understand why you have a problem with having something you enjoyed being exposed as bad. I am perfectly comfortable to admit that I liked some of RA Salvatore's books eventhough they are pretty shitty books. Are you that self-coscious that whatever you do has to be good? |
lol...The game is definitely good, just read a good amount of reviews for this game. However, the game is neither crap nor great. 7/10 is the score I'd give it, and to me that is good, and neither bad or excellent.
Most of the hate this game receives is unwarranted and perpetuated by people who hate the game simply because they don't like the changes it made from the original, and view the game as 'bad' because of this. That to me is faulty logic.