Anon attacking Sony employees and their children?

[DonFerrari]

dsister said:

DonFerrari said:

It still saying the lawyer are saying this in the process not that Sony did, there is difference... it's as Sony saying GeoHotz fleed from USA and the other party say he was in vacation. Any lawyer can say what he wants and he need to prove.

And your proof is that Sony took out other/os from Slim to cut cost not that they cut support so they could cut cost... but i already accepted the possibility that cuting support because of cost in developing firmware... but this seems odd as they keep releasing firmware, wouldn't be cheapier to just don't release more firmwares??

So Sony cut it just to piss of Linux user?

The lawyers represent Sony. They better not be lying in court... 

Umm... they keep releasing new updates in firmware... including blocking piracy, trophies, being able to play new games, unlocking more RAM. If they stopped releasing firmware the PS3 would cease gaining new functions. 

Exactly they keep releasing firmware to gain new functions and accept the costs, but just for other/os they would take the support for cost saving? does it make sense for you?

And lawyers don't lie "they show the true that convey them''... and they never stated that GH fleed they sugested that his actions could harm the suit, because they couldn't accusate without proves.