Did it occur to anyone that Anonymous doesn't exist, the way organizations exist normally? Has anyone thought the whole Anonymous thing is merely a banner people do stuff under, where they aren't identified? Like someone throws the whole "Anonymous 99" thing against the Federal Reserve and the banking system itself, and that is Anonymous. Someone else ends up telling Colbert to not mess with the name of the International Space Station and let Xenu get it. Other under the Anonymous banner ends up doing stuff, like going after Sony.
In one sense, it is a joke. In another sense, maybe it is an Internet consciousness that flows out of a set of values for freedom of information and to do what one wants, without powers that be become known. In short, think of it merely as a banner that a loose association of people with someone similar values operate under, without their identities out. Shoot, what prevents you, if you like Sony so much, from doing an Anonymous Love Sony spot and sticking it up on YouTube? Look at the decrees Anonymous was supposed to said at past, and you see there isn't any organized structure that will stop you.
So, there you go, say Anonymous Love Sony.
