Kasz216 said:
leatherhat said:
Kasz216 said:
leatherhat said:
Kasz216 said:
leatherhat said:
Euphoria14 said:
leatherhat said:
Euphoria14 said:
Time to bust out some good ol' Abe Lincoln for you guys.
"Those who sacrifice Liberty for Security deserve neither"
|
Except theres no sacrifice of liberty- I can still hack my ps3 if I want and do with it what I will
|
If Sony wins then your PS3 modding could be punishable by law.
|
Are we talking about the Geohotz case? Because they are only going after him for distribution.
|
Not true actually. I'd suggest reading the charges against him.
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf2/SonyvHotz-1.pdf
|
Just read the nature of the action, they are complaining that they created and distrubted the hack. I don't see anything else.
|
Unlawful circumvention = what every person who uses his hack would be doing.
|
The two are lumped together, so its unlikely hacking your ps3 would be charged without distribution. And even so, talk about unenforcable.
|
So, your resposne to me showing that he was charged with it... is "He was charged with it, but it's the same lawsuit so it doesn't count."
That's like saying is charged with both Murder and attempted murder, if it wasn't for the murder, there is no proof he'd be charged for attempted murder.
Aside from which, all that matters is that they claim it's illegal.
Whether or not they'd ever enforce it or not, I'd look at the RIIA.
They sue individual share holders all the time for piracy, heck even small time pirates.
It's actually easy money for them, and they have the lawyers on retainer anyway.
You just sue individuals, and the indivudals can't fight back since they don't have the resources, and basically instantly settle.
And if they don't, the lawyers stretch out the lawsuit until you do settle... because you don't have the money of a huge corporation.
|
