Kasz216 said:
Tigerlure said:
Kasz216 said:
Tigerlure said:
Alright, so me and other gamers might end up without the PSN because some group decides that Sony infringes on their rights?
To all you consumer rights people on here, how does that help me and the other millions of consumers rights who buy a PS3 to play games?
|
That's kinda like asking how it helps people who want to get an education, when a building gets shut down because of a protest.
The answer? Stop thinking so short term.
|
So I'm thinking short term because I can't see how this will help the majority of PS3 owners in any way? Assuming this group gets whatever they want ( I assume Linux and freedom to hack their PS3s), thats a small minority of PS3 Gamers.
|
A) A minorities rights are worth a damn because they inconveince the majority.
Seriously, this is the arguement you want to go with.
B) It goes on much past that however, since the legal arguement sony has applied is they can literally do anything they want to your PS3 to make you buy a new one.
Including removing things like Blu-ray playback or intentionally brick yours for no reason if they feel like it.
According to Sony, it's perfectly legal for them to brick out of warranty consoles at will, randomly for whatever reason. If you can't see why that should be illegal... well ok.
I don't know what to say.
|
Most of them have not done any research on the situation. If Sony wins the Geohot case all the Sony products you bought will still be owned by them and they can do as they please with it. Thats the reality of the situation and it seems people could not be bothered.
