By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Conegamer said:
Buzzi said:
fps_d0minat0r said:

people think theres no mistake in launching monster hunter tri for wii?

ok just look at the hundreds of multiplatforms on wii/ps3 and see the MASSIVE difference in quality.

monster hunter tri would have been tri times better on ps3.

please dont act clueless, its a FACT that better hardware can run better games......if it cant then we would all have atari 2600's.


So Wii should not have games ._.

You've also gott remember that it was initially a PS3 game, but was cancelled because it wasn't worth the price.

Tri was near-perfection. Aside from graphical fidelity, it wouldn't have been worth it. It wouldn't have been as well advertised, and likely wouldn't have sold as well, or at least not make as much money...

If this was true as well, why is OoT still number 1? And Galaxy 1 and 2 in the top 5???

yeah monster hunter is a game that relies heavily on core mechanics rather than graphics. Its the reason why lost planet 2 bombed on the HD systems. They had to focus their resources on the grahpical aspects and the game ended up a pretty game with boring gameplay.  Thats why RE4 is better than RE5, any Devil may cry for the ps2 is better than 4, the best castlevanias are the 2d ones etc.

His argument that better hardware leads to better games is a common misguided thought.



My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)