Kasz216 said:
Hence, "Yes and No." I am open to it being so, but don't believe it because I feel like there should be an alternate explination. Not accepting something becuase "there has to be another explination" I feel is one of the greatest weaknesses of a scientist and a viewpoint I try to avoid. It's why scientific revolutions are usually made at the feet of outdated scientists rather then the new and old going hand in hand together. Heck "ghosts" may actually end up having a rational explination not yet known, invloving string theory or intersecting dimensions or who knows what that has nothing to do with peoples spirits. |
But then they would no longer be supernatural, no? In the end isn't there a rational explanation for everything, but we just haven't found it yet?
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)







