| ultraslick said: Also, just wanted to add that I think everyone agrees and is aware of the same thing. We are just forming different stances on the same issue. Has the wii dipped a bit... Yea but what does that mean? That is where the argument begins, and it is a good one that I doubt has a clear answer. Heres something for you Nintendo fans; As can be pointed out, the wii is beating the 360 currently after Kinect and redesign.. this is amazing. and is only loosing to the PS3 because of the glut of recent and upcoming PS3 exclusives, it is suprising the ps3 isnt further ahead in this regard. Also amazing. But even if the wii manages to pass them in weekly sales (for the sake of argument), it has still fallen from grace, (meaning its level of past sales dominance). But that doesnt mean it isnt still graceful and great.
Lets say that the wii is a horse in a race, It started out killing the opposition, has hit a few hurdles here and there, has had portions near the end of the race where the other horses section times were faster, but it will still win the derby here people. It will still win the derby. But is the derby more important than who is currently winning? I dont know, just thoughts. |
If we're using a horse race analogy, then who gets over the finishing line first is all that matters.
If I put money on a horse to win, and it races into an early lead of an absolute mile, but then stumbles, breaks one of its legs and then finishes the race on 3 legs, but still crosses the line in first place, then I'll win a ton of money.
If I put money on a horse that has a terrible start but then has a late surge at the same time as the leader stumbles, and outpaces the leader in the final yards, but ultimately finishes last, I'm not going to win anything. I'll have lost all my money.
VGChartz
