d21lewis on 02 April 2011
| fallen said: If the most powerful never wins, why didn't Sony make the Ps3 less powerful than the PS2 and cost $79?
Simple question.
If anybody who thinks most powerful doesnt win can answer it satisfactorily, I will surrender. |
We said the most powerful never wins. We didn't say the least powerful always wins. Otherwise we'd be remembereing all of the good games we played on our Turbografx 16's and Sega Dreamcasts. The winner is the one that finds the balance between great price (usually the weaker system), adequate power (usually close to the best but not the very best), and great games (usually not the Wii).
Please place your surrender flag on my steps by sundown.
