By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
yo_john117 said:
osamanobama said:
damefan said:
osamanobama said:
damefan said:
osamanobama said:
damefan said:
Mad55 said:

 

xbl has hardly any dedicated server games (playstation has way more)

Until you have concrete numbers you are just guessing.

xbl has small multiplayer counts, i think the most so far is 24. (psn has 30, 32, 60, and i believe 256)

Developer choice, doesn't matter if its XBL or PSN. Halo would be retarded with 24 players, same with Gears. Those are your two exclusive shooters. You actually think PSN can handle a higher player count than XBL? You think Sony's network is better than Microsofts? You are delusional.

xbl is very closed network (cant get games with features like LBP and Portal)

Once again I say to you Final Fantasy XI was a cross platform MMO on Xbox LIVE. How is that closed? LBP could easily be done on XBL. You are making up facts once again. Find an article written by a professional stating otherwise and I'll retract my statement.

xbl started the paid DLC

I'm pretty sure developer's started paid DLC but once again if you can prove it with an article stating MS started it then by all means go ahead.


if you could please show me some dedicated server games for xbl i will retract my statement.

psn does have more player count in games, nothing is keeping microsoft from having more dedicated server games.

could you provide a link that FFXI was cross platform. xbl doesnt allow for the free sharing of content that LBP has, so yes it would have it. also like gabe newall said, he could put steam onto xbl, but he could for psn.

dlc used to be free on pc (still largely is), until xbl for xbox 1 came, and they forced developers to charge for content, as they continue to do, and Gabe also doesnt like that, he prefers free

if you could please show me some dedicated server games for xbl i will retract my statement.

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Gears of War 3

Homefront

Rainbow Six:Vegas

psn does have more player count in games, nothing is keeping microsoft from having more dedicated server games.

Dedicated server does not mean higher player count. Its developers choice for the last time.

could you provide a link that FFXI was cross platform. xbl doesnt allow for the free sharing of content that LBP has, so yes it would have it. also like gabe newall said, he could put steam onto xbl, but he could for psn.

http://www.giantbomb.com/cross-platform-multiplayer/92-4183/games/

dlc used to be free on pc (still largely is), until xbl for xbox 1 came, and they forced developers to charge for content, as they continue to do, and Gabe also doesnt like that, he prefers free

Didn't know you and Gabe were on a first name basis. And without Xbox LIVE on Xbox 1 you wouldn't have PSN or it wouldn't be 1/10th what it is today.

i was not aware that BAd company has dedicated servers, i could of sworn there were host migrations (could u prove i really dont know)

gears 3 isnt out yet (but yes it will have them, thank God)

homefront does. 

i dont think rainbow 6 does, but sure.

and all but one of those games are also on ps3.

i meant to say:

could you provide a link that FFXI was cross platform. xbl doesnt allow for the free sharing of content that LBP has, so yes it would have it. also like gabe newall said, he couldNT put steam onto xbl, but he could for psn.

and i said his last name, its bolded. hes the owner of valve and steam.

and ps2 had online play, so i dont know what ur talking about, but its a bunch of bs

I thought that the PS2 got online after the original Xbox got it.

And can you honestly say with a straight face that PSN would be pretty much the same without all of Xbox Live's pushing it to become better?

no obviously competetion makes things better (we r not a communist state.... yet). that goes for xbl too, also steam could have potentally given that compatition.

anyway i dont know if live came out first, but i do know that the ps2 had the data port for online since launch.