PSN vs XBL which is better?

[damefan]

mantlepiecek said:

damefan said:

mantlepiecek said:

And all of those games put together don't have as much whining about lag as much as COD has. That just proves something doesn't it?

Dedicated servers are wayy superior to P2P, don't even try to argue it. No host advantage, no lag, more players, less glitches(yes, glitches) and it also helps in people playing across the countries easily without lag. It usually doesn't require you to go around in your router settings messing with ports and stuff.

Then I guess COD, Halo, and Gears must be that much more superior and fun to have 3x or more the amount of players to put up with it.

O fuckin really?

I am suuuure GT 5 is 100x more fun than Forza since sooo many more people play that game..

Fact is, no. of people playing a game doesn't equal its quality. Until you realise this, you shouldn't even be having a discussion about which one is better because you clearly don't know the difference between popularity and quality.

Metacritic Scores:

MAG-76                                                        Gears of War-94

Resistance: Fall of Man-86                       Gears of War 2-93

Resistance 2:-87                                         Halo 3-94

Killzone 2-91                                                 Halo:Reach-91

Killzone 3-84

I guess everyone else needs to realize this as well. Or maybe the 360 just has better exclusive shooters. I'll go with the latter. Dedicated servers doesn't make a better game.