Wii first party library vs PS3 first party library?

[mantlepiecek]

dsister said:

CGI-Quality said:

An IP owned by Sony should count in a topic like this. It's their IP, they can do want they want with it, so it should count as it IS 1st Party (since again, 2nd Party games/IPs don't exist). An IP is either owned by a 3rd party, independent company, or a 1st Party manufacturer (there is no in between in regards to the property). That's not strictly my definition, it's (for the most part) common knowledge.

You not wanting to include LBP or inFAMOUS is strictly on you, but it doesn't make them any less internal properties.

Yes, the IP is owned by Sony. But the games weren't developed by Sony. So that makes them 3rd party games, published by a first party.

Despite my hating of Wikipedia the link that the other poster posted even proves my point. 

Well, except for wikipedia, there is not a single source explaining first party games.

Also, cnet has an article in which it considers Pokemon as first party game, so it pretty much doesn't matter who develops a game if the IP is owned by a company.

"Nintendo is the leader when it comes to first-party titles. Its franchises--Mario, Zelda, Donkey Kong, Pokemon, and others--have proven to be extremely profitable for the company. But when you look at first-party games on Microsoft's Xbox 360 or Sony's PlayStation 3, there's no comparison to Nintendo."

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10236513-17.html

Oh, and its an old article btw :)