Acevil said:
As in comparing a game that is talked about from niche demographic, compared to a boarder demographic. Sorry if I am not making sense, I am not able to edit some of my work, due to me taking off my glasses.....because I was about to go to sleep. So if my sentences are grammatically incorrect, I am terribly sorry. |
No, no your grammar is fine. It's just that I don't see the differentiation between classics and 'cult classics'. Or at least I do, but not in the sense that digitalnasties is suggesting. He stated Sony games don't have the ability to stand the test of time. I offered an example that contradicted his claims. I have not played Ico personally, but considering the industry recognition from gamers, game sites and game developers I think it more than qualifies for obliterating digitalnasties notion.
Do you agree? Or do you disagree and think that Ico is not talked about today and that nobody remembers it? I'm not sure if you're contradicting me or what's the case. I'm just trying to understand...
