By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
snowdog said:
uno said:

As I said it seemed strange to me that they gave it a 7.5. The shear level of customization, addition of classes and perks, improved cinematic story over the first....I dont get it.

I think the first should have gotten a 7. This ...well...I havent played it.

This ^^

Very odd that despite High Voltage addressing the vast majority of issues that gamers and reviewers had with the first one - particularly the level design and addition of proper cutscenes - and they deem the original one to be better. Very strange indeed. :o/

As Crytek said so very well:

“You can’t take a 60 rated team and make a 90 rated game. That’s probably impossible. Let’s say you’re making a 90 plus rated game. Everything you do, every aspect that goes into the game, every person working on it, has to be 90 plus rated, or you don’t get to 90 plus rated.

You don’t make a 90 plus rated game with a 30 rated bush in the game. Everything has to reach this quality bar. Every person working on it has to put that kind of effort into it, otherwise you have to do some things that are at 94/95 to pull the average up to 90. This threshold is so difficult to attain. That’s a really difficult task for any developer to accomplish.”